In 2005, stakeholders formed the Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force (Task Force). This Task Force, administered by LESJWA provides stakeholders an opportunity to coordinate and share the cost of all implementation efforts. The Task Force is comprised of all the dischargers identified in the TDML, including: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permittees, wastewater treatment plants, agricultural operators, concentrated animal feeding operations (dairies), and a number of other state, federal, or tribal agencies that own land or operate facilities that discharge in the watershed.
Lake Elsinore first appeared on California’s 303(d) list of impaired waterbodies in 1994. Canyon Lake was added to that list in 1998. The lakes were deemed to be impaired by low dissolved oxygen (DO) levels and excess algae growth. Elevated nutrient concentrations (e.g., phosphorus and nitrogen) were cited as the primary cause of poor water quality in both lakes.
The Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) for nutrient discharges to Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore in 2004. The TMDL became effective when the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) gave it final approval on September 30, 2005. The scientific data and analysis used to justify the TMDL is summarized in a detailed technical support document prepared by the Regional Board staff.
The TMDL specified numeric targets for DO, Chlorophyll a, Ammonia, Total Phosphorus (TP) and Total Nitrogen (TN) concentrations in both lakes. It also established Load Allocations (LA) and Waste Load Allocations (WLA) to govern the discharge of excess nutrients from non-point sources and point sources, respectively.
The TMDL includes a detailed Implementation Plan which describes a variety of activities that must be undertaken to meet water quality standards in Canyon Lake and Lake Elsinore. In the decade following EPA’s approval, stakeholders throughout the watershed initiated a large number of programs and projects to comply with the requirements set forth in the TMDL Implementation Plan.
Copies of Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board Resolution No. R8-2004-0037 and TMDL Technical Document prepared by Board staff , as well as, deliverables submitted to the Board by Task Force stakeholders are available on the Regional Board Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake webpage.
Since December of 2004, SAWPA/LESJWA staff has been working closely with Stakeholders and Regional Board staff to address the requirements of the Basin Plan Amendment to implement the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake nutrient TMDLs.
In June 2005, the LESJWA Board authorized staff to serve administrator of the Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Task Force. In its role as administrator of the Task Force, LESJWA staff provides the following services:
a. Organize and facilitate TMDL TASK FORCE and TAC meetings,
b. Perform secretarial, clerical and administrative services, including providing meeting summaries to TMDL TASK FORCE members,
c. Manage TMDL TASK FORCE funds and prepare annual reports of TMDL TASK FORCE assets and expenditures,
d. Serve as the contracting party, for the benefit of the TMDL TASK FORCE, for contracts with all consultants, contractors, vendors and other entities,
e. Seek funding grants to assist with achieving goals and objectives of the TMDL TASK FORCE.
f. Coordinate with other agencies and organizations as necessary to facilitate TMDL TASK FORCE work.
g. Administer the preparation of quarterly and annual reports, as required by the TMDL Implementation Plan, and submit them as required by the TMDL Implementation Plan on behalf of the TMDL TASK FORCE.
h. Administrator of agreements to market and administer limited-used licenses for any excess offset credits generated by TMDL Best Management Practice implementation projects.
Task Force Documents
Agendas and Meeting Materials
|November 12, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handout (1)|
|October 23, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)
|September 25, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)
|August 14, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)|
|June 19, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handout (1)|
|April 24, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handout (1)|
|March 19, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handout (1)|
|February 21, 2019||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)
|January 9, 2019||Agenda||Handout (1)|
|January 17, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handout (1)||Presentation (1)
|February 14, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)|
|March 13, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)
|May 23, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)|
|August 15, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)|
|September 19, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)
|October 30, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentation (1)
|November 14, 2018||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handout (1)|
|January 4||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|February 16||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|March 22||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|April 19||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentations|
|May 16||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|June 13||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|August 15||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|September 12||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentations|
|October 19||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations (1/2)
|November 14||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentations|
|January 13||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|February 23||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|March 22||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|May 3||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|June 14||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentations|
|July 27||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|September 21||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentations|
|October 19||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Presentations|
|December 2||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|October 27||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations (1/2)
|September 9||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|August 11||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|March 11||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|January 13||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts||Presentations|
|September 19||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|August 21||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|June 18||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|May 21||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|April 23||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|March 27||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|February 14||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
|January 23||Agenda||Meeting Notes||Handouts|
Technical Advisory Committee: Agendas & Meeting Materials
Task Force Deliverables
2015 Lake Elsinore/Canyon Lake Modeling Technical Memos: Dr. Michael Anderson
Canyon Lake Hybrid Treatment Project – (Funded in part by Proposition 84 Grant)
San Jacinto River Watershed Nutrient TMDL BMP Implementation Project (Funded by Proposition 40 Grant) – Final Report December 2012
Canyon Lake Hypolimnetic Oxygenation System Preliminary Design Phase I Report – Final Report April 2011
Lake Elsinore Recharge Pipeline Project – Completed October 2010 (Funded by Proposition 40 Grant)
Lake Elsinore 3D Modeling Tool (ReMetrix)
3D Resource Management Tool for Lake Elsinore Documentation – October 2010
Satellite Imagery Analysis (Aquatechnex)
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Chlorophyll-a – July 2010
Lake Elsinore Satellite Scans – July 2010
Lake Elsinore Surface Area and Volume Table – July 2010
Bathymetry & Sediment Study Final Report
Bathymetry & Sediment Study -September 2010
Canyon Lake Bacteria Characterization Report – Final Report December 2009
Assessment of Water Quality Concentration and Loads from Natural Landscapes (SCCWRP) – Final Report February 2007
Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Survey of Canyon Lake – Final Report July 2004
San Jacinto Nutrient Management Plan (Funded by Proposition 13) – Final Report April 2004
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake Nutrient Source Assessment (Tetra Tech – Watershed Model) – Final Report January 2003
Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake are located in the southwestern portion of the 780 square-mile San Jacinto watershed approximately 60 miles southeast of Los Angeles. Most of the San Jacinto River watershed falls within Riverside County; however, a small western section is located in Orange County.
Flow to the San Jacinto River begins in the San Jacinto Mountains, then travels northwest along the San Jacinto fault zone. The river then flows through Canyon Lake and exits the Perris Block into the lower Elsinore Basin created by the Elsinore fault zone. Canyon Lake is located near the watershed outlet and was formed by the damming of the San Jacinto River. Runoff from as far as Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Hemet, and Perris contribute to surface flows that reach Canyon Lake during rainfall events. Over 90 percent of the San Jacinto watershed drains to Canyon Lake. During normal dry periods, the San Jacinto River is essentially dry, contributing little or no flow to Canyon Lake. Lake Elsinore is located approximately 3miles downstream of Canyon Lake, at the bottom of the San Jacinto watershed. The local tributary area to Lake Elsinore is 47 square-miles. Surface flow from the watershed reaches Lake Elsinore through release, overflow, or seepage from the Canyon Lake dam. Lake Elsinore acts much like a sink, with almost nonexistent outflow.
In rare situations, including torrential rains and extended rain periods, the lake overflows into Temescal Creek, and ultimately to the Santa Ana River.
Since 2000, stakeholders, in cooperation with the Regional Board, have been working to identify the source of nutrients impairing each lake, and evaluate the impacts to water quality and beneficial uses incurred from nutrient sources.
In December 2004, the Regional Board adopted amendments to the Basin Plan to incorporate TMDLs for nutrients in Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake. Task 4 of the adopted Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake TMDL Amendment required stakeholders to prepare and implement a Nutrient Monitoring Program. The program was to include the following:
- A watershed-wide monitoring program to determine compliance with interim and/or final nitrogen and phosphorus allocations; compliance with the nitrogen and phosphorus TMDL, and load allocations (LAs), including waste load allocations (WLAs).
- A Lake Elsinore nutrient monitoring program to determine compliance with interim and final nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and dissolved oxygen numeric targets. This program will evaluate and determine the relationship between ammonia toxicity and total nitrogen allocation to ensure that the total nitrogen allocation will prevent ammonia toxicity in Lake Elsinore.
- Canyon Lake nutrient monitoring program to determine compliance with interim and final nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and dissolved oxygen numeric targets. The monitoring program will evaluate and determine the relationship between ammonia toxicity and the total nitrogen allocation to ensure that the total nitrogen allocation will prevent ammonia toxicity in Canyon Lake.
The Santa Ana Water Board approved the program’s monitoring plan in March 2006. This initial monitoring approach continued through July 2010, where following a review of available data that indicated consistent and similar nutrient concentrations and physical water quality parameters the monitoring program was reduced.
Monitoring continued under the revised program through June 2012. At that time, in agreement with Regional Board, while watershed monitoring would continue, in‐lake monitoring would be discontinued temporarily to redirect TMDL program funding towards nutrient reduction actions including lake stabilization, fishery management and alum application in Canyon Lake.
In April 2015, the Lake Elsinore & Canyon Lake Task Force prepared a draft revised monitoring work plan to support TMDL implementation. This plan focused on a reassessment of current conditions and established a revised monitoring framework to better assess water quality trends towards meeting the existing TMDL numeric targets.
Lake Elsinore & Canyon lake Nutrient TMDL Compliance Monitoring Program
- Lake Elsinore Fisheries Management Work Plan and Quality Assurance Project Plan (August 2019)
- Phase 2 TMDL Compliance Monitoring Plan (2016)
- Phase 2 Quality Assurance Project Plan (2016)
- LE/CL TMDL – 2016-17 Annual Monitoring Report – Final
- LE/CL TMDL – 2017-18 Annual Monitoring Report – Final
- LE/CL TMDL – 2017-18 Annual Monitoring Report – Appendix All
- LE/CL TMDL – 2018-19 Annual Monitoring Report – Draft
- 2019-20 Quarterly Monitoring Reports
|Chapter||Deadline (draft – final)|
|Table of Contents|
|Table of Contents – Draft||3/5/2016|
|Table of Contents – Final|
|Chapter 1 Introduction – Draft||3/5/2016|
|Chapter 1 Introduction – Final||10/19/2016|
|2) Problem Statement|
|Chapter 2 Problem Statement – Draft||3/5/2016|
|Chapter 2 Problem Statement – Final||10/18/2016|
|3) Numeric Targets|
|Chapter 3 Numeric Targets – Draft||12/20/2016|
|4) Source Analysis|
|Chapter 4 Source Assessment – Draft||10/5/2016|
|5) Linkage Analysis|
|Chapter 5 Linkage Analysis – Draft||6/7/2017|
|6) Wasteload Allocation and Load Allocation|
|Chapter 6 Wasteload Allocation and Load Allocation – Draft||4/17/2017|
|7) Implementation and Planning Requirements|
|Chapter 7 Implementation and Planning Requirements – Draft||12/4/2017|
|8 ) Monitoring Requirements|
|Chapter 8 Monitoring Requirements – Draft||12/4/2017|
|9 ) Demonstrating Compliance|
|Chapter 9 Demonstrating Compliance – Draft||2/12/2018|
|Chapter 9 References|
|Complete Technical Document|
|Complete Technical Document – Draft||8/4/2017|
|Complete Technical Document – Final|
|CEQA – Substitute Environmental Document|
|Substitute Environmental Document||3/24/2018|
|Economic Analysis DRAFT||10/15/2018|
|Supplemental Project Fact Sheets||4/30/2018|
|Administrative Record – Draft|
|Administrative Record – Final|
|Appendix A – Supporting Biological Data||3/5/2016|